Iranian Studies

Investigating the literary language and scientific and historical language ‎in Rashidi's history and explaining their characteristics

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Elham Torkashvand 1
Ali Mohammadi 2

1 Ph.D. student of language and literature, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran‎

2 Professor of Language and Literature Department of Bu-Ali Sina University Hamedan Iran

https://doi.org/10.22059/jis.2022.348655.1151
Abstract
Rashidi's history belongs to Timurid period, was written by Mirza Haidar Doghlat and its subject is to explain events and conflicts that happened to some of descendants of Genghis Khan and Mirzayan Doghlat and were written by historians. The scene of these conflicts is parts of present-day China, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan and Tajikistan. This book was written about five centuries ago, in Kashmir and outside the geographical area of   Iran, by a literate Mongol who had learned it in the Herat School. Apart from the historical events of this precious book, which is one of most unique historical books of Timurid period, this book can also be examined from a literary and rhetorical point of view. The results of this research show that the author has flourished his genius in the field of literature by using verbal and spiritual crafts as well as using a special method of narration. As a classical writer, he has tried to write his writings, both in terms of content and in terms of literary form, wisely and favored by scholars and literati. Hence, Rashidi's history, apart from historical propositions, contains literary and rhetorical flavors that have a worthy effect on the feelings and emotions of the audience. In this research, which has been done in a library manner, by giving examples and explaining them, the artificial parts of the text are distinguished from the narrative parts, and the reasons for Mirza Haidar's tendency towards literary industries and techniques are also explained.

Keywords

Rashidi history
‎literary ‎language
‎historical ‎language
‎scientific ‎language
‎rhetoric.‎
Subjects
اشرفی، م.م (1386). بهزاد و شکل‌گیری مکتب مینیاتور بخارا در قرن 16 میلادی، ترجمة نسترن زندی، تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
ایگلتون، تری (1386). پیش‌درآمدی بر نظریة ادبی، ترجمة عباس مخبر، تهران: مرکز.
بیک‌بابایی، بهروز (1399). «تحلیل سبک‌شناسانة تاریخ رشیدی اثر محمدحیدر دوغلات»، ماهنامة تخصصی سبک‌‌شناسی و نظم و نثر فارسی (بهار ادب)، س 13، ش8، ص1ـ22.
حبیبی، عبدالحی (1355). هنر عهد تیموریان، تهران: بنیاد فرهنگ ایران.
حق‌شناس، علی‌محمد (1370). مقالات ادبی و زبان‌شناختی، تهران: نیلوفر.
خطیبی، رهبر (1390). فن نثر در ادب پارسی، چ6، تهران: زوار.
دوغلات، میرزامحمدحیدر (1383). تاریخ رشیدی، تصحیح عباسقلی غفاری‌فرد، تهران: میراث مکتوب.
سارتر، ژان‌پل (1363). ادبیات چیست، ترجمة ابوالحسن نجفی و مصطفی رحیمی، تهران: نیلوفر.
سودآور، ابوالعلاء (1380). هنر دربارهای ایران، ترجمة ناهید محمد‌شمیرانی، تهران: کارنگ.
محمدی، علی (1388). «ضرورت بازنگری تاریخ رشیدی»، آینة میراث، ش45، صص253ـ272.
ولک، رنه؛ آستین، وارن (1382). نظریة ادبیات، ترجمة ضیاء موحد و پرویز مهاجر، چ2، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
Iranian Studies
Volume 13, Issue 4
March 2024
Pages 69-88

Home

َArticle Processing charges

Journal Metrics

Contact Us