Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor at University of Istanbul

Abstract

It seems that in the Safavid studies, the political and diplomatic relations between Shah Ismail and Bayezid II, which was in a relatively peaceful environment, were overshadowed by subsequent wars. In general, Safavid studies have focused on a period that began with the wars due to the coming of Salim. Perhaps the most important reason is the lack of resources in which they refer to such points. However, the Ottoman Army records show that both sides have had a high level of diplomatic relations before the period of long wars. The main purpose of this paper is to study a peaceful period of relations between the Safavid and Ottoman states based on the sources and documents of the Ottoman archives. In fact, before the Salim I, the Ottoman government had a good relationship with the Safavid, who had arrived from Sheikh to Shah in the early 16th century. In this framework, both sides sent each other ambassadors and presents. According to the Ottoman sources and the bailiffs of Bayezid II sent to Sheikh Ismael Ardabilly, we will examine the Ottoman look for the king of Iran and accept him as a leader of the cult. In addition, we will explain how the ambassadors travel on both sides and use it to express their strength.

Keywords

امینى هروى، (1383). صدرالدین ابراهیم، فتوحات شاهى تاریخ صفوى از آغاز تا سال ۹۲۰ﻫ.ق، به تصحیح محمدرضا نصیرى، تهران، انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
فلسفى، نصرالله، (1332). جنگ چالدران، مجلۀ دانشکده ادبیات، سال اول، شمارۀ 2، صص 127-50
 خواندمیر، غیاث‌الدین بن همام‌الدین، (1380). تاریخ حبیب‌السیر، تصحیح محمد دبیرسیاقی، تهران، خیام.
Tevarih-i Âl-i Osman, 1953, Aşıkpaşazâde, Aşıkpaşazâde Tarihi, Istanbul 1953.
Brummett, P., 2009, Keşifler Çağında Osmanlı Denizgücü ve Doğu Akdeniz’de Diplomasi, trans. Nazlı Pişkin, Istanbul.
Defter-i Müsveddat-ı İn’amat ve Tasaddukat ve Teşrifat ve İrsaliyyat ve Gayrihu 909–929, Belediye Lib., Muallim Cevdet, No. 0.71.
Dehqan, M., & Genç, V., 2018,  “Kurds as Spies: Information-Gathering on the 16th Century Ottoman-Safavid Frontier,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. vol. 71/2, 197–230.
Fisher, S. N., 2014, Sultan Bayezid Han 1481–1512, trans. Hazal Yalın, Istanbul.
İdris-i Bidlisi, Heşt Behişt, Süleymaniye Library, Esad Efendi, No. 2198.
Kreutel, R., 1997, Haniwaldanus Anonimi’ne Göre Sultan Bayezid-i Velî (1481-1512) trans., Necdet Öztürk, İstanbul 1997.
Hinz, Walter 1948, Uzun Hasan ve Şeyh Cüneyd; XV. yy’da İran’ın Milli Bir Devlet Haline Yükselişi, trans. T. Bıyıklıoğlu, Ankara.
Sohrweide, H, 1965, “Der Sieg der Safaviden und siene Rückwirkungen auf die Schiiten Anatolies im 16 Jahrhundert”, Der Islam XLI, 139.
Şahin, İlhan&Emecen, Feridun, Osmanlılarda Divan-Bürokrasi-Ahkâm: II. Bayezid Dönemine Ait 906/1501 Tarihli Ahkâm Defteri,İstanbul 1994.
Walsh, J. R. 1962,“The Historiography of Ottoman-Safavid Relations in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries”, Historians of the Middle East, eds, Bernard Lewis-P.M. Holt, Oxford University Press, London.