Click subject name to see related articles.
خلیل کهریزی
Volume 11, Issue 1 , September 2021, , Pages 79-94
Abstract
The spread of national narrations is common in the history of their narration and writings. Sometimes this expansion is done with the aim of explaining and interpreting a sentence or a part of the main narrative, in the form of a sub-story. Therefore, these stories can also help to unveil the textual ...
Read More
The spread of national narrations is common in the history of their narration and writings. Sometimes this expansion is done with the aim of explaining and interpreting a sentence or a part of the main narrative, in the form of a sub-story. Therefore, these stories can also help to unveil the textual knots; because they gain a historical understanding of a sentence or a word in the form of a sub-narrative. One of the cases of spreading the narrative is the story that has been mentioned in some sources in the discussion of Anoushiran''s financial reforms. In talking about the financial reforms of this king, the line of narration in Shahnameh and most of the chronicles is such that with a brief reference to the status of tribute in the period of previous kings, there is talk of the beginning of reforms in Ghobad''s time when remains unfinished with his death and Anoushiran continued the reforms . Some chroniclers have cut along this line, and before beginning to talk about Anoushirvan''s reforms, they have narrated a story that is also Ghobad''s main motivation for financial reform. In this article, we try, first, to talk about the recording and the correct meaning of the phrase "No one praises the escaped one" of the kingdom of Anoushirvan, which is in a chaotic state in the manuscripts and the editions of this book, with the help of this narration. After that, we will discuss the authenticity of the narration and the origin of this narration in the second part of the article, and thus show one of the examples of the spread of narration in the national narrations.After that, we will discuss the authenticity of the narration and the origin of this narration in the second part of the article, and thus show one of the examples of the spread of narration in the national narrations
mahdi salah
Abstract
The process of reform in the time of the second parliament (November 15, 1909 – December 24, 1911), which resulted in inviting Morgan Shuster for financial improvements in the late Qajar era, represented the controversy between tradition and modernism in Iran. Many factors were against the process ...
Read More
The process of reform in the time of the second parliament (November 15, 1909 – December 24, 1911), which resulted in inviting Morgan Shuster for financial improvements in the late Qajar era, represented the controversy between tradition and modernism in Iran. Many factors were against the process of change in Iran and could lead to social crises. Actually, the implementation of fundamental reforms was very problematic, regarding the specific social model of Iran, and the resistance of the traditional forces. This research, which is based on archival documents and historical sources, seeks to answer these questions: what were the main powers against Shuster's measures, and what were their motivations? The hypothesis was that the challenge between tradition and modernism was very influential; but the research findings demonstrate that in addition to traditional domestic factors such as princes, courtiers, landlords, and ..., who generally opposed any changes, foreign forces of Russia and Britain were among the main opponents as well.
