<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-0643</Issn>
				<Volume>8</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Comparative Analysis of Architecture and Architectural arays of Chahaharbagh and Aligholi agha mosque-school</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Comparative Analysis of Architecture and Architectural arays of Chahaharbagh and Aligholi agha mosque-school</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>17</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>36</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">68710</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jis.2018.68710</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khajeh Ahmad Attari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Faculty of Handicrafts, Isfahan University of Art</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohieddin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aghadavoudi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD. Condidate in the Comparative and Analytical History of Islamic art</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Bahareh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taghavinejad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Faculty of Handicrafts, Isfahan University of Art</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This paper focuses on Chaharbagh and ʻAliqoli Āqa, two mosque-schools of Isfahan. These monuments were built in the era of Shah Soltan Hossein, and situated within two outstanding urban complexes in Isfahan. The paper proposes two hypotheses. First, the mentioned mosque-schools – as the most significant scientific-religious monuments of the Shah Soltan Hossein era – have regular stylistic components, specifically regarding architectural ornaments. Second, one of the critical factors in the formation of the distinctions and similarities of the two monuments is the support of the shah. The findings of this research indicate that the essential stylistic attributes of the ornaments are the use of textured geometric patterns such as &lt;em&gt;shah-gereh&lt;/em&gt; on the mosaic tiles in specific colors, the placement of the quadruplicate and archetypal cross forms called &lt;em&gt;chalipa&lt;/em&gt;, as well as various symmetric patterns, and the like. The content of the architectural ornaments reflects the Shiʻa beliefs, and praises the supporter of the two monuments (shah). Despite these similarities and the inscription of the shah’s name in the golden point of the two façades, there are many differences in the architectural and ornamental structures, including the quantitative and qualitative differences in the dimensions of the building, and some elements in Chaharbagh monument, which has no equivalent in ʻAliqoli Āqa.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This paper focuses on Chaharbagh and ʻAliqoli Āqa, two mosque-schools of Isfahan. These monuments were built in the era of Shah Soltan Hossein, and situated within two outstanding urban complexes in Isfahan. The paper proposes two hypotheses. First, the mentioned mosque-schools – as the most significant scientific-religious monuments of the Shah Soltan Hossein era – have regular stylistic components, specifically regarding architectural ornaments. Second, one of the critical factors in the formation of the distinctions and similarities of the two monuments is the support of the shah. The findings of this research indicate that the essential stylistic attributes of the ornaments are the use of textured geometric patterns such as &lt;em&gt;shah-gereh&lt;/em&gt; on the mosaic tiles in specific colors, the placement of the quadruplicate and archetypal cross forms called &lt;em&gt;chalipa&lt;/em&gt;, as well as various symmetric patterns, and the like. The content of the architectural ornaments reflects the Shiʻa beliefs, and praises the supporter of the two monuments (shah). Despite these similarities and the inscription of the shah’s name in the golden point of the two façades, there are many differences in the architectural and ornamental structures, including the quantitative and qualitative differences in the dimensions of the building, and some elements in Chaharbagh monument, which has no equivalent in ʻAliqoli Āqa.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Persian art</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Safavid architecture</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Chaharbagh mosque-school</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Aliqoli Āqa mosque-school</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">architectural ornaments</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jis.ut.ac.ir/article_68710_5a12850f8849b61f261173d500c9d1bc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
